Mobiles comparison

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs Motorola Edge 70 Fusion

Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.

Swap order Open in the compare tool Best Mobiles under ₹50,000

Key differences

From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.

Where Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G leads

  • Costs ₹4,691 less
  • Weight (g): 192 vs 193
  • Thickness (mm): 7.5 vs 7.99

Where Motorola Edge 70 Fusion leads

  • Screen Size (inch): 6.8 vs 6.7
  • Refresh Rate (Hz): 144 vs 120
  • RAM: 8 GB / 12 GB vs 6 GB / 8 GB
  • Battery: 7000 vs 6000
  • Charging (W): 68 vs 45

Comparing 2 products

Specification
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
Motorola · Mobiles
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
Samsung · Mobiles
Overall Score — —
Price ₹29,090 ₹24,399 Lowest price
Scores
Spec Score 61/100 🏆 47/100 ≠
Display
Display AMOLED Super AMOLED ≠
Screen Size (inch) 6.8 🏆 6.7 ≠
Resolution 1272x2772 1080x2340 ≠
Refresh Rate (Hz) 144 🏆 120 ≠
Performance
Processor Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ≠
RAM 8 GB / 12 GB 🏆 6 GB / 8 GB ≠
Storage & Memory
Storage 128 GB / 256 GB / 512 GB 128 GB / 256 GB ≠
Camera
Main Camera 50 MP 50 MP
Selfie Camera 32 MP 12 MP ≠
Battery & Charging
Battery 7000 🏆 6000 ≠
Charging (W) 68 🏆 45 ≠
General
Operating System Android 16 Android 15 ≠
Connectivity
Network 5G 5G
Design
Weight (g) 193 192 🏆
Thickness (mm) 7.99 7.5 🏆

Crowd verdict: which would you buy?

Crowd verdict
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs Motorola Edge 70 Fusion

Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.

More comparisons

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs Lava Virat Curve 5G Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 5G Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Motorola Edge 70 Fusion vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Motorola Edge 70 Fusion vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 5G Motorola Edge 70 Fusion vs realme P4s 5G

How we score these two

Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.