Mobiles comparison
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 5G
Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.
Key differences
From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.
Where Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G leads
- Costs ₹3,600 less
- Weight (g): 192 vs 225
- Thickness (mm): 7.5 vs 8.4
Where Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 5G leads
- Screen Size (inch): 6.99 vs 6.7
- Battery: 8000 vs 6000
Comparing 2 products
| Specification |
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
Samsung · Mobiles
|
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 5G
Xiaomi · Mobiles
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | — | — |
| Price | ₹24,399 Lowest price | ₹27,999 ≠ |
| Scores | ||
| Spec Score | 47/100 🏆 | 46/100 ≠ |
| Display | ||
| Display | Super AMOLED | OLED ≠ |
| Screen Size (inch) | 6.7 | 6.99 🏆 |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1080x2396 ≠ |
| Refresh Rate (Hz) | 120 | 120 |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 ≠ |
| RAM | 6 GB / 8 GB | 6 GB / 8 GB |
| Storage & Memory | ||
| Storage | 128 GB / 256 GB | 128 GB ≠ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera | 12 MP | 8 MP ≠ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 6000 | 8000 🏆 |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 45 |
| General | ||
| Operating System | Android 15 | Android 16 ≠ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Network | 5G | 5G |
| Design | ||
| Weight (g) | 192 🏆 | 225 ≠ |
| Thickness (mm) | 7.5 🏆 | 8.4 ≠ |
Crowd verdict: which would you buy?
Crowd verdict
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 5G
Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.
More comparisons
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs Lava Virat Curve 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 5G vs Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
How we score these two
Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.