Mobiles comparison
Motorola Edge 70 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.
Key differences
From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.
Where Motorola Edge 70 Pro 5G leads
- Refresh Rate (Hz): 144 vs 120
- Storage: 256 GB vs 128 GB
- Charging (W): 90 vs 67
- Weight (g): 183 vs 226
- Thickness (mm): 6.99 vs 8.46
Where Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G leads
- Costs ₹1,491 less
- Screen Size (inch): 6.83 vs 6.8
- Battery: 9000 vs 6500
Comparing 2 products
| Specification |
Motorola Edge 70 Pro 5G
Motorola · Mobiles
|
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G
Xiaomi · Mobiles
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | — | — |
| Price | ₹38,490 | ₹36,999 Lowest price |
| Scores | ||
| Spec Score | 78/100 🏆 | 51/100 ≠ |
| Display | ||
| Display | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Screen Size (inch) | 6.8 | 6.83 🏆 |
| Resolution | 1272x2772 | 1280x2772 ≠ |
| Refresh Rate (Hz) | 144 🏆 | 120 ≠ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8500 Extreme | Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 ≠ |
| RAM | 8 GB / 12 GB | 8 GB ≠ |
| Storage & Memory | ||
| Storage | 256 GB 🏆 | 128 GB ≠ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera | 50 MP | 16 MP ≠ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 6500 | 9000 🏆 |
| Charging (W) | 90 🏆 | 67 ≠ |
| General | ||
| Operating System | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Network | 5G | 5G |
| Design | ||
| Weight (g) | 183 🏆 | 226 ≠ |
| Thickness (mm) | 6.99 🏆 | 8.46 ≠ |
🏆 Crowd verdict — which would you buy?
🏆 Crowd verdict
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G vs Motorola Edge 70 Pro 5G
Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.
More comparisons
How we score these two
Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.