Mobiles comparison
Motorola Edge 70 Pro 5G vs vivo S2 FE 5G
Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.
Key differences
From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.
Where Motorola Edge 70 Pro 5G leads
- Costs ₹509 less
- Refresh Rate (Hz): 144 vs 120
- RAM: 8 GB / 12 GB vs 6 GB / 8 GB
- Storage: 256 GB vs 128 GB
- Charging (W): 90 vs 44
- Weight (g): 183 vs 224
- Thickness (mm): 6.99 vs 8.59
Where vivo S2 FE 5G leads
- Screen Size (inch): 6.83 vs 6.8
- Battery: 10000 vs 6500
Comparing 2 products
| Specification |
Motorola Edge 70 Pro 5G
Motorola · Mobiles
|
vivo S2 FE 5G
vivo · Mobiles
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | — | — |
| Price | ₹38,490 Lowest price | ₹38,999 ≠ |
| Scores | ||
| Spec Score | 78/100 🏆 | 42/100 ≠ |
| Display | ||
| Display | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Screen Size (inch) | 6.8 | 6.83 🏆 |
| Resolution | 1272x2772 | 1260x2800 ≠ |
| Refresh Rate (Hz) | 144 🏆 | 120 ≠ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8500 Extreme | Dimensity 7300e ≠ |
| RAM | 8 GB / 12 GB 🏆 | 6 GB / 8 GB ≠ |
| Storage & Memory | ||
| Storage | 256 GB 🏆 | 128 GB ≠ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera | 50 MP | 32 MP ≠ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 6500 | 10000 🏆 |
| Charging (W) | 90 🏆 | 44 ≠ |
| General | ||
| Operating System | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Network | 5G | 5G |
| Design | ||
| Weight (g) | 183 🏆 | 224 ≠ |
| Thickness (mm) | 6.99 🏆 | 8.59 ≠ |
🏆 Crowd verdict — which would you buy?
🏆 Crowd verdict
vivo S2 FE 5G vs Motorola Edge 70 Pro 5G
Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.
More comparisons
How we score these two
Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.