Mobiles comparison

Lava Virat Curve 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G

Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.

Swap order Open in the compare tool Best Mobiles under ₹50,000

Key differences

From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.

Where Lava Virat Curve 5G leads

  • Costs ₹1,400 less
  • Weight (g): 184 vs 192

Where Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G leads

  • Screen Size (inch): 6.7 vs 6.67
  • Thickness (mm): 7.5 vs 8.55

Comparing 2 products

Specification
Lava Virat Curve 5G
Lava · Mobiles
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
Samsung · Mobiles
Overall Score — —
Price ₹22,999 Lowest price ₹24,399 ≠
Scores
Spec Score 39/100 47/100 🏆
Display
Display — Super AMOLED
Screen Size (inch) 6.67 6.7 🏆
Resolution 1080x2400 1080x2340 ≠
Refresh Rate (Hz) 120 120
Performance
Processor Dimensity 7100 Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ≠
RAM 6 GB 6 GB / 8 GB ≠
Storage & Memory
Storage 128 GB 128 GB / 256 GB ≠
Camera
Main Camera 50 MP 50 MP
Selfie Camera 13 MP 12 MP ≠
Battery & Charging
Battery 6000 6000
Charging (W) 45 45
General
Operating System Android 16 Android 15 ≠
Connectivity
Network 5G 5G
Design
Weight (g) 184 🏆 192 ≠
Thickness (mm) 8.55 7.5 🏆

Crowd verdict: which would you buy?

Crowd verdict
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs Lava Virat Curve 5G

Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.

More comparisons

Lava Virat Curve 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G Lava Virat Curve 5G vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Lava Virat Curve 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F70 5G Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs Lava Virat Curve 5G Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 5G Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs Motorola Edge 70 Fusion

How we score these two

Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.