Mobiles comparison

Samsung Galaxy F70 5G vs Lava Virat Curve 5G

Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.

⇄ Swap order Open in the compare tool Best Mobiles under ₹50,000

Key differences

From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.

Where Samsung Galaxy F70 5G leads

  • Costs ₹5,000 less
  • Screen Size (inch): 6.7 vs 6.67
  • Thickness (mm): 7.5 vs 8.55

Where Lava Virat Curve 5G leads

  • Refresh Rate (Hz): 120 vs 90
  • RAM: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • Battery: 6000 vs 5000
  • Charging (W): 45 vs 25
  • Weight (g): 184 vs 192

Comparing 2 products

Specification
Lava Virat Curve 5G
Lava · Mobiles
Samsung Galaxy F70 5G
Samsung · Mobiles
Overall Score — —
Price ₹22,999 ₹17,999 Lowest price
Scores
Spec Score 39/100 🏆 34/100 ≠
Display
Display — Super AMOLED
Screen Size (inch) 6.67 6.7 🏆
Resolution 1080x2400 1080x2340 ≠
Refresh Rate (Hz) 120 🏆 90 ≠
Performance
Processor Dimensity 7100 Exynos 1330 ≠
RAM 6 GB 🏆 4 GB ≠
Storage & Memory
Storage 128 GB 128 GB
Camera
Main Camera 50 MP 50 MP
Selfie Camera 13 MP 13 MP
Battery & Charging
Battery 6000 🏆 5000 ≠
Charging (W) 45 🏆 25 ≠
General
Operating System Android 16 Android 15 ≠
Connectivity
Network 5G 5G
Design
Weight (g) 184 🏆 192 ≠
Thickness (mm) 8.55 7.5 🏆

🏆 Crowd verdict — which would you buy?

🏆 Crowd verdict
Samsung Galaxy F70 5G vs Lava Virat Curve 5G

Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.

More comparisons

Samsung Galaxy F70 5G vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Samsung Galaxy F70 5G vs MIVI One 5G Samsung Galaxy F70 5G vs Lava Virat Curve 5G Lava Virat Curve 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G Lava Virat Curve 5G vs Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Lava Virat Curve 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F70 5G

How we score these two

Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.