Mobiles comparison
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion vs Lava Virat Curve 5G
Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.
Key differences
From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.
Where Motorola Edge 50 Fusion leads
- Costs ₹4,000 less
- Refresh Rate (Hz): 144 vs 120
- RAM: 8 GB / 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Charging (W): 68 vs 45
- Weight (g): 175 vs 184
- Thickness (mm): 7.8 vs 8.55
Where Lava Virat Curve 5G leads
- Battery: 6000 vs 5000
Comparing 2 products
| Specification |
Lava Virat Curve 5G
Lava · Mobiles
|
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Motorola · Mobiles
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | — | — |
| Price | ₹22,999 | ₹18,999 Lowest price |
| Scores | ||
| Spec Score | 39/100 | 58/100 🏆 |
| Display | ||
| Display | — | 6.7" pOLED 144Hz |
| Screen Size (inch) | 6.67 | 6.67 |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 |
| Refresh Rate (Hz) | 120 | 144 🏆 |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 7100 | Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ≠ |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB / 12 GB 🏆 |
| Storage & Memory | ||
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB / 256 GB ≠ |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera | 13 MP | 32 MP ≠ |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 6000 🏆 | 5000 ≠ |
| Charging (W) | 45 | 68 🏆 |
| General | ||
| Operating System | Android 16 | Android 14 ≠ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Network | 5G | 5G |
| Design | ||
| Weight (g) | 184 | 175 🏆 |
| Thickness (mm) | 8.55 | 7.8 🏆 |
| Specifications | ||
| Camera | — | 50 MP + 13 MP |
🏆 Crowd verdict — which would you buy?
🏆 Crowd verdict
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion vs Lava Virat Curve 5G
Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.
More comparisons
How we score these two
Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.