Laptops comparison
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10
Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.
Key differences
From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.
Where Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN leads
- Screen Size (inch): 15.3 vs 13.3
- Battery (Wh): 60 vs 54.7
Where Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 leads
- Costs ₹4,090 less
- Weight (kg): 1.15 vs 1.49
Comparing 2 products
| Specification |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN
Lenovo · Laptops
|
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10
Lenovo · Laptops
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | — | — |
| Price | ₹94,990 | ₹90,900 Lowest price |
| Scores | ||
| Spec Score | 53/100 🏆 | 47/100 ≠ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Intel Core Ultra 5 322 | AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS ≠ |
| RAM (GB) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage & Memory | ||
| Storage (GB) | 512 | 512 |
| Storage Type | M.2 NVMe SSD | M.2 NVMe SSD |
| Performance | ||
| Graphics | — | AMD Radeon 680M |
| Display | ||
| Screen Size (inch) | 15.3 🏆 | 13.3 ≠ |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 1920x1200 |
| Refresh Rate (Hz) | 60 | 60 |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery (Wh) | 60 🏆 | 54.7 ≠ |
| General | ||
| Operating System | Windows 11 | Windows 11 |
| Features | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Design | ||
| Weight (kg) | 1.49 | 1.15 🏆 |
Crowd verdict: which would you buy?
Crowd verdict
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10
Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.
More comparisons
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN vs Dell 15 CD15260
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN vs Acer Swift Neo SFN14-55
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 vs Dell 15 CD15260
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 vs Acer Swift Neo SFN14-55
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 vs Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA
How we score these two
Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.