Laptops comparison
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 vs Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA
Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.
Key differences
From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.
Where Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 leads
- Weight (kg): 1.15 vs 1.74
Where Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA leads
- Costs ₹3,179 less
- Screen Size (inch): 16 vs 13.3
- Battery (Wh): 70 vs 54.7
Comparing 2 products
| Specification |
Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA
Asus · Laptops
|
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10
Lenovo · Laptops
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | — | — |
| Price | ₹87,721 Lowest price | ₹90,900 ≠ |
| Scores | ||
| Spec Score | 56/100 🏆 | 47/100 ≠ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS ≠ |
| RAM (GB) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage & Memory | ||
| Storage (GB) | 512 | 512 |
| Storage Type | M.2 NVMe SSD | M.2 NVMe SSD |
| Performance | ||
| Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno | AMD Radeon 680M ≠ |
| Display | ||
| Screen Size (inch) | 16 🏆 | 13.3 ≠ |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 1920x1200 |
| Refresh Rate (Hz) | 60 | 60 |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery (Wh) | 70 🏆 | 54.7 ≠ |
| General | ||
| Operating System | Windows 11 | Windows 11 |
| Features | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Design | ||
| Weight (kg) | 1.74 | 1.15 🏆 |
Crowd verdict: which would you buy?
Crowd verdict
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 vs Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA
Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.
More comparisons
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 vs Dell 15 CD15260
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 vs Acer Swift Neo SFN14-55
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 vs Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA
Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA vs Acer Swift Neo SFN14-55
Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA vs Dell 15 CD15260
Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10
How we score these two
Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.