Laptops comparison

Acer Aspire 5 A514-54H vs Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB)

Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.

Swap order Open in the compare tool Best Laptops under ₹50,000

Key differences

From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.

Where Acer Aspire 5 A514-54H leads

  • Costs ₹2,000 less
  • RAM (GB): 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Storage (GB): 512 vs 256
  • Screen Size (inch): 14 vs 13
  • Battery (Wh): 53.8 vs 36.5
  • Weight (kg): 1.2 vs 1.23

Where Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) leads

Nothing on the numbers we can compare.

Comparing 2 products

Specification
Acer Aspire 5 A514-54H
Acer · Laptops
Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB)
Apple · Laptops
Overall Score — —
Price ₹69,890 Lowest price ₹71,890 ≠
Scores
Spec Score 53/100 🏆 21/100 ≠
Performance
Processor Intel Core Ultra 5 125H Apple A18 Pro ≠
RAM (GB) 16 GB 🏆 8 GB ≠
Storage & Memory
Storage (GB) 512 🏆 256 ≠
Storage Type M.2 NVMe SSD SSD ≠
Performance
Graphics — Apple A18 Pro
Display
Screen Size (inch) 14 🏆 13 ≠
Resolution 1920x1200 2408x1506 ≠
Refresh Rate (Hz) — 60
Battery & Charging
Battery (Wh) 53.8 🏆 36.5 ≠
General
Operating System Windows 11 macOS ≠
Features
Touchscreen No No
Design
Weight (kg) 1.2 🏆 1.23 ≠

Crowd verdict: which would you buy?

Crowd verdict
Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) vs Acer Aspire 5 A514-54H

Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.

More comparisons

Acer Aspire 5 A514-54H vs Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) Acer Aspire 5 A514-54H vs Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R Acer Aspire 5 A514-54H vs Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-71M Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) vs Acer Aspire 5 A514-54H Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) vs Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) vs Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-71M

How we score these two

Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.