Laptops comparison

Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) vs Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R

Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.

Swap order Open in the compare tool Best Laptops under ₹50,000

Key differences

From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.

Where Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) leads

  • Costs ₹3,100 less
  • Weight (kg): 1.23 vs 1.39

Where Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R leads

  • RAM (GB): 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Storage (GB): 512 vs 256
  • Screen Size (inch): 14 vs 13
  • Refresh Rate (Hz): 120 vs 60
  • Battery (Wh): 60 vs 36.5

Comparing 2 products

Specification
Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB)
Apple · Laptops
Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R
Motorola · Laptops
Overall Score — —
Price ₹71,890 Lowest price ₹74,990 ≠
Scores
Spec Score 21/100 59/100 🏆
Performance
Processor Apple A18 Pro Intel Core 5 210H ≠
RAM (GB) 8 GB 16 GB 🏆
Storage & Memory
Storage (GB) 256 512 🏆
Storage Type SSD SSD
Performance
Graphics Apple A18 Pro Intel Integrated ≠
Display
Screen Size (inch) 13 14 🏆
Resolution 2408x1506 2880x1880 ≠
Refresh Rate (Hz) 60 120 🏆
Battery & Charging
Battery (Wh) 36.5 60 🏆
General
Operating System macOS Windows 11 ≠
Features
Touchscreen No No
Design
Weight (kg) 1.23 🏆 1.39 ≠

Crowd verdict: which would you buy?

Crowd verdict
Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) vs Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R

Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.

More comparisons

Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) vs Acer Aspire 5 A514-54H Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) vs Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) vs Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-71M Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R vs Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R vs Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-71M Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R vs Acer Aspire 5 A514-54H

How we score these two

Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.