Mobiles comparison
realme P4s 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro
Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.
Key differences
From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.
Where realme P4s 5G leads
- Screen Size (inch): 6.78 vs 6.67
- Refresh Rate (Hz): 144 vs 120
- Battery: 8000 vs 5100
- Charging (W): 80 vs 67
Where Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro leads
- Costs ₹3,069 less
- Weight (g): 187 vs 208
- Thickness (mm): 7.98 vs 8.6
Comparing 2 products
| Specification |
realme P4s 5G
realme · Mobiles
|
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro
Xiaomi · Mobiles
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | — | — |
| Price | ₹32,499 | ₹29,430 Lowest price |
| Scores | ||
| Spec Score | 57/100 🏆 | 50/100 ≠ |
| Display | ||
| Display | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Screen Size (inch) | 6.78 🏆 | 6.67 ≠ |
| Resolution | 1272x2772 | 1220x2712 ≠ |
| Refresh Rate (Hz) | 144 🏆 | 120 ≠ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 7400 Ultra | Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ≠ |
| RAM | 8 GB / 12 GB | 8 GB / 12 GB |
| Storage & Memory | ||
| Storage | 128 GB / 256 GB | 128 GB / 256 GB |
| Camera | ||
| Main Camera | 50 MP | 200 MP ≠ |
| Selfie Camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery | 8000 🏆 | 5100 ≠ |
| Charging (W) | 80 🏆 | 67 ≠ |
| General | ||
| Operating System | Android 16 | Android 13 ≠ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Network | 5G | 5G |
| Design | ||
| Weight (g) | 208 | 187 🏆 |
| Thickness (mm) | 8.6 | 7.98 🏆 |
| Specifications | ||
| Camera | — | 200 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP |
🏆 Crowd verdict — which would you buy?
🏆 Crowd verdict
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro vs realme P4s 5G
Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.
More comparisons
How we score these two
Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.