Laptops comparison
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 vs Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R
Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.
Key differences
From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.
Where Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 leads
- Weight (kg): 1.15 vs 1.39
Where Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R leads
- Costs ₹15,910 less
- Screen Size (inch): 14 vs 13.3
- Refresh Rate (Hz): 120 vs 60
- Battery (Wh): 60 vs 54.7
Comparing 2 products
| Specification |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10
Lenovo · Laptops
|
Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R
Motorola · Laptops
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | — | — |
| Price | ₹90,900 | ₹74,990 Lowest price |
| Scores | ||
| Spec Score | 47/100 | 59/100 🏆 |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS | Intel Core 5 210H ≠ |
| RAM (GB) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage & Memory | ||
| Storage (GB) | 512 | 512 |
| Storage Type | M.2 NVMe SSD | SSD ≠ |
| Performance | ||
| Graphics | AMD Radeon 680M | Intel Integrated ≠ |
| Display | ||
| Screen Size (inch) | 13.3 | 14 🏆 |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 2880x1880 ≠ |
| Refresh Rate (Hz) | 60 | 120 🏆 |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery (Wh) | 54.7 | 60 🏆 |
| General | ||
| Operating System | Windows 11 | Windows 11 |
| Features | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Design | ||
| Weight (kg) | 1.15 🏆 | 1.39 ≠ |
Crowd verdict: which would you buy?
Crowd verdict
Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10
Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.
More comparisons
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 vs Dell 15 CD15260
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 vs Acer Swift Neo SFN14-55
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 vs Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA
Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R vs Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB)
Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R vs Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-71M
Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R vs Acer Aspire 5 A514-54H
How we score these two
Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.