Laptops comparison
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN vs Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB)
Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.
Key differences
From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.
Where Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN leads
- Costs ₹39,250 less
- Screen Size (inch): 15.3 vs 13.6
- Battery (Wh): 60 vs 53.8
Where Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB) leads
- Weight (kg): 1.23 vs 1.49
Comparing 2 products
| Specification |
Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB)
Apple · Laptops
|
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN
Lenovo · Laptops
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | — | — |
| Price | ₹1,34,240 | ₹94,990 Lowest price |
| Scores | ||
| Spec Score | 45/100 | 53/100 🏆 |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Apple M5 | Intel Core Ultra 5 322 ≠ |
| RAM (GB) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage & Memory | ||
| Storage (GB) | 512 | 512 |
| Storage Type | SSD | M.2 NVMe SSD ≠ |
| Performance | ||
| Graphics | Apple M5 (8-core) | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen Size (inch) | 13.6 | 15.3 🏆 |
| Resolution | 2560x1664 | 1920x1200 ≠ |
| Refresh Rate (Hz) | 60 | 60 |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery (Wh) | 53.8 | 60 🏆 |
| General | ||
| Operating System | macOS | Windows 11 ≠ |
| Features | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Design | ||
| Weight (kg) | 1.23 🏆 | 1.49 ≠ |
Crowd verdict: which would you buy?
Crowd verdict
Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB) vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN
Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.
More comparisons
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN vs Dell 15 CD15260
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN vs Acer Swift Neo SFN14-55
Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB) vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN
Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB) vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10
Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB) vs Dell 15 CD15260
How we score these two
Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.