Laptops comparison

Dell 15 CD15260 vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN

Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.

Swap order Open in the compare tool Best Laptops under ₹50,000

Key differences

From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.

Where Dell 15 CD15260 leads

  • Costs ₹4,500 less
  • Screen Size (inch): 15.6 vs 15.3

Where Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN leads

  • Battery (Wh): 60 vs 41
  • Weight (kg): 1.49 vs 1.81

Comparing 2 products

Specification
Dell 15 CD15260
Dell · Laptops
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN
Lenovo · Laptops
Overall Score — —
Price ₹90,490 Lowest price ₹94,990 ≠
Scores
Spec Score 40/100 53/100 🏆
Performance
Processor Intel Core Ultra 5 225H Intel Core Ultra 5 322 ≠
RAM (GB) 16 GB 16 GB
Storage & Memory
Storage (GB) 512 512
Storage Type M.2 NVMe SSD M.2 NVMe SSD
Performance
Graphics Intel Arc 130T —
Display
Screen Size (inch) 15.6 🏆 15.3 ≠
Resolution 1920x1080 1920x1200 ≠
Refresh Rate (Hz) 60 60
Battery & Charging
Battery (Wh) 41 60 🏆
General
Operating System Windows 11 Windows 11
Features
Touchscreen No No
Design
Weight (kg) 1.81 1.49 🏆

Crowd verdict: which would you buy?

Crowd verdict
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN vs Dell 15 CD15260

Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.

More comparisons

Dell 15 CD15260 vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 Dell 15 CD15260 vs Acer Swift Neo SFN14-55 Dell 15 CD15260 vs Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN vs Dell 15 CD15260 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN vs Acer Swift Neo SFN14-55

How we score these two

Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.