Laptops comparison
Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-71M vs Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB)
Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.
Key differences
From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.
Where Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-71M leads
- RAM (GB): 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Storage (GB): 512 vs 256
- Screen Size (inch): 14 vs 13
- Battery (Wh): 55 vs 36.5
Where Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) leads
- Costs ₹7,100 less
- Weight (kg): 1.23 vs 1.5
Comparing 2 products
| Specification |
Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-71M
Acer · Laptops
|
Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB)
Apple · Laptops
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | — | — |
| Price | ₹78,990 | ₹71,890 Lowest price |
| Scores | ||
| Spec Score | 49/100 🏆 | 21/100 ≠ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Intel Core Ultra 5 125H | Apple A18 Pro ≠ |
| RAM (GB) | 16 GB 🏆 | 8 GB ≠ |
| Storage & Memory | ||
| Storage (GB) | 512 🏆 | 256 ≠ |
| Storage Type | M.2 NVMe SSD | SSD ≠ |
| Performance | ||
| Graphics | Intel Arc | Apple A18 Pro ≠ |
| Display | ||
| Screen Size (inch) | 14 🏆 | 13 ≠ |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 2408x1506 ≠ |
| Refresh Rate (Hz) | — | 60 |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery (Wh) | 55 🏆 | 36.5 ≠ |
| General | ||
| Operating System | Windows 11 | macOS ≠ |
| Features | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Design | ||
| Weight (kg) | 1.5 | 1.23 🏆 |
Crowd verdict: which would you buy?
Crowd verdict
Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) vs Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-71M
Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.
More comparisons
Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-71M vs Asus Vivobook 16 X1607QA
Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-71M vs Asus Vivobook S14 S3407VA
Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-71M vs Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R
Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) vs Acer Aspire 5 A514-54H
Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) vs Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R
Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB) vs Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-71M
How we score these two
Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.