Laptops comparison
Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R vs Asus ExpertBook B9 B9406CAA
Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.
Key differences
From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.
Where Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R leads
- Costs ₹2,75,000 less
Where Asus ExpertBook B9 B9406CAA leads
- RAM (GB): 64 GB vs 16 GB
- Storage (GB): 2048 vs 512
- Battery (Wh): 70 vs 60
- Weight (kg): 1.1 vs 1.39
Comparing 2 products
| Specification |
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9406CAA
Asus · Laptops
|
Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R
Motorola · Laptops
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | — | — |
| Price | ₹3,49,990 | ₹74,990 Lowest price |
| Scores | ||
| Spec Score | 83/100 🏆 | 59/100 ≠ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Intel Core Ultra X7 358H | Intel Core 5 210H ≠ |
| RAM (GB) | 64 GB 🏆 | 16 GB ≠ |
| Storage & Memory | ||
| Storage (GB) | 2048 🏆 | 512 ≠ |
| Storage Type | SSD | SSD |
| Performance | ||
| Graphics | Intel Arc B390 | Intel Integrated ≠ |
| Display | ||
| Screen Size (inch) | 14 | 14 |
| Resolution | 2880x1800 | 2880x1880 ≠ |
| Refresh Rate (Hz) | 120 | 120 |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery (Wh) | 70 🏆 | 60 ≠ |
| General | ||
| Operating System | Windows 11 | Windows 11 |
| Features | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | No ≠ |
| Design | ||
| Weight (kg) | 1.1 🏆 | 1.39 ≠ |
Crowd verdict: which would you buy?
Crowd verdict
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9406CAA vs Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R
Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.
More comparisons
Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R vs Apple MacBook Neo (A18 Pro, 8 GB, 256 GB)
Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R vs Acer Aspire Go 14 AG14-71M
Motorola Motobook 60 14IRH10R vs Acer Aspire 5 A514-54H
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9406CAA vs Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra NP960UJH
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9406CAA vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AR
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9406CAA vs Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB)
How we score these two
Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.