Laptops comparison
Dell 15 CD15260 vs Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB)
Both side by side, spec by spec — the better value in each row is marked, and prices are the ones we last recorded.
Key differences
From the spec sheets, so this compares numbers on paper and not how they feel in real use.
Where Dell 15 CD15260 leads
- Costs ₹43,750 less
- Screen Size (inch): 15.6 vs 13.6
Where Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB) leads
- Battery (Wh): 53.8 vs 41
- Weight (kg): 1.23 vs 1.81
Comparing 2 products
| Specification |
Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB)
Apple · Laptops
|
Dell 15 CD15260
Dell · Laptops
|
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | — | — |
| Price | ₹1,34,240 | ₹90,490 Lowest price |
| Scores | ||
| Spec Score | 45/100 🏆 | 40/100 ≠ |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Apple M5 | Intel Core Ultra 5 225H ≠ |
| RAM (GB) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage & Memory | ||
| Storage (GB) | 512 | 512 |
| Storage Type | SSD | M.2 NVMe SSD ≠ |
| Performance | ||
| Graphics | Apple M5 (8-core) | Intel Arc 130T ≠ |
| Display | ||
| Screen Size (inch) | 13.6 | 15.6 🏆 |
| Resolution | 2560x1664 | 1920x1080 ≠ |
| Refresh Rate (Hz) | 60 | 60 |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery (Wh) | 53.8 🏆 | 41 ≠ |
| General | ||
| Operating System | macOS | Windows 11 ≠ |
| Features | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Design | ||
| Weight (kg) | 1.23 🏆 | 1.81 ≠ |
Crowd verdict: which would you buy?
Crowd verdict
Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB) vs Dell 15 CD15260
Which would you buy? One vote per visitor.
More comparisons
Dell 15 CD15260 vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10
Dell 15 CD15260 vs Acer Swift Neo SFN14-55
Dell 15 CD15260 vs Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA
Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB) vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 83UR009QIN
Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB) vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 13ARP10
Apple MacBook Air M5 13-inch (16 GB, 512 GB) vs Dell 15 CD15260
How we score these two
Rows come from each category's spec sheet, and the winner is picked by direction: capacity, battery and refresh rate are better higher, while power draw, noise and energy use are better lower. Descriptive specs (panel type, compressor type) never get a winner. The overall score blends our editorial review score with reader ratings — read the full methodology.